I'm fairly confident in the accuracy of the gender and poppping tags. I'm sure there are some errors in there, but not enough to skew the results noticeably. I'm significantly less confident in the sexual content tags. They're often applied pretty arbitrarily, and that that will continue to be the case unless I sit down and hammer out definitions that classify each sex act. So I have to be careful in drawing conclusions from this data. But I can make a few observations.
- When authors write sex into their stories, they they tend to go big or stay home. In a majority of the stories, the sexual content is Explicit. Of the remainder, a majority of the content is Mild.
- The number of Male/Male stories is too small to generate any meaningful commentary.
- There's little difference in the frequency of explicit sex in Male/Female versus Female/Female stories.
The fun part comes when you look at how often there's sexual content based on who's inflating.
- Stories where only only women inflate: ~25%
- Stories where only men inflate: ~20%
- Stories where both men and women inflate: ~60% This is also the percent of such stories that include popping.
So if you have a man and a woman inflating in the same story, then it's a safe bet there will be some manner of fooling around followed by, or perhaps interrupted by, an explosion.
Of course, this assumes that all the stories in the library are properly tagged.
Amazing that we can apply statistical analysis to an esoteric fetish. Is there anything that math cannot do?
Anything you would like to tell us about sexual content? None vs. implied vs. mild vs. explicit? Anything interesting about sexual makeup of the characters in explicit stories?
Formerly known as unknown.